This is often designed to be the "head to" powder-or darn near it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge a person could handload. It really is the muse for a lot of pet loads, but I have not been content with the outcomes.
They have got executed identically for me. Like Anyone else I rushed to have the newer SC version but have now switched again. Preferably you'd like about 100% loading density. When you've got enough situation capability to the H4831(extensive) you're in all probability better off.
Can they be interchanged with no anxieties other then using regular load procedures when switching from ton to lot?
That means the knowledgable handloader can, with some extrapolation, locate a commencing load when just one is shown for a specific cartridge.
Beginner to reloading. This will be used for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I was in a position to get my hands on a pair lbs of h4831.
I'm sure, tough moments. H4831SC will certainly get the job done, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded extensive. I do not remember powder charge off the best of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which can be in which I normally intention to get. As part of your scenario making use of what you might have (and what I must have completed) I'd personally begin with the tip in the bearing surface of the bullet right within the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you locate a velocity node.
You could have to h4831 vs h4831sc generate a few far more posts to have cleared to complete PM's. When you finally get to that standing I might publish from the classified reloading area to see if any individual is near you for your trade.
Im beneath the understanding I desire to use h4831sc. I have go through that these powders are equivalent In addition to the shorter grain dimensions on the sc. Should I even now be looking out for h4381sc?
WA I'd advise a slower burner which will give much better case density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly when you happen to be loading heavies extended.
[e mail secured] gn and one hundred fifteen CT's, I've h4831sc killed far more Deer using this combo than each of the rifles I very own mixed, Function as much as this but the sweet location are going to be all over 54, I'm a Two Little bit-06 nut and I have some things tat is effective very well for me Should your interested
As with h4831sc the 4831 vs 4831SC, They may be a similar/identical powder cept for grain dimension. Load data is interchangeable.
It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Identified a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot team nowadays. It is slightly slower than H1000, but shoots excellent. Many thanks for the advice, It can be great to know that I've got choices when a single or another powder is dried up.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but experienced significantly better speed and precision with H1000. I would fairly use a slower burning powder with 215g supplements.
I discovered that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions were sub MOA with 4831sc with lower to min costs. I’m chatting 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it absolutely was a reduced 60s grain demand inside a Norma scenario. Not what I was seeking, but accurate Nevertheless.